Advances in Proteomics Research in Environmental Stress Response in Plants

407

TABLE 13.2 (Continued)

Plant Species

Organ Used for

Fractionation

Experimental

Condition

Technique

Used

No. of

Identified

DAP (Differentially Abundant Proteins)

References

Proteins

Xerophyta viscosa

Leaves

Drought

2D-MALDI­

TOF MS/MS

438

Up: Zn-finger helicase TF; gene regulation: non-

LTR retrotransposons, maturases; chaperonin;

EF-Tu precursor, ribosomal L28

Abdalla et al.

(2010)

Cicer arietinum

Seedlings

Drought

2DE ESI-MS/

MS

75

Genotypic differences: H2B, H3 – up in T, down

in S; DNA cytosine methyltransferase Zmet3 – up

in T; ROS scavenging – APX, SOD, GPX – up

in T

Subba et al.

(2013)

Glycine max

Root tip

Flooding

nano-LC MS/

MS.

39

Down: epsilon2-COP, RACK1, beta-catenin,

splicing factor PWI domain-containing, clathrin

heavy chain

Komatsu et

al. (2014)

Glycine max

phosphoproteome

Root tip

Flooding

LC-MS/MS

14

Zinc finger protein, glycine rich protein, and Rrp5 Yin &

Komatsu

(2015)

Glycine max

Root tip

Flooding

–

365

Down: H1, H3; NOP1/NOP56; 60S preribosome;

pre-mRNA processing (spliceosome components)

Yin &

Komatsu

(2016)

Mitochondria

Pisum sativum

Leaves

Drought, Cold

Herbicide

(Paraquat –

662.5 mg/L)

2DE Q-TOF

MS; BN-PAGE

29

Up: MDH, GDC, SHMT isoforms; ATP synthase

α, β, γ; HSP22, HSP70, HSP90, chaperonin 10;

βCA

Taylor et al.

(2005)